Cross-Border and Domestic Mergers & Acquisitions in India's Banking Sector (2007–2017): An Empirical Evaluation of Financial Stability, Regulatory Governance, and Socio-Economic Impact.

The Indian banking sector has undergone significant transformations since the onset of economic liberalization in the 1990s. Between 2007 and 2017, mergers and acquisitions emerged as a crucial strategy to strengthen financial institutions, expand market presence, and enhance operational efficiency. The global financial crisis of 2007–08 further underscored the importance of robust banking systems, prompting regulators and policymakers to encourage consolidation. M&As in Indian banking were not only driven by market forces but also by government initiatives aimed at creating stronger, more resilient institutions capable of supporting rapid economic growth. This paper analyzes the landscape of M&As in Indian banking during this decade, focusing on their drivers, case studies, challenges, and socio-economic implications.

Mergers and acquisitions in Indian banking have historically been shaped by regulatory directives, financial reforms, and market dynamics. The post-liberalization period witnessed increased competition, entry of foreign banks, and growing demands for capital adequacy under Basel norms. By 2007, the Indian banking industry faced challenges such as rising NPAs, need for technological modernization, and global integration. M&As were seen as a strategic response to these challenges, enabling banks to achieve economies of scale, diversify portfolios, and enhance competitiveness. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) played a central role in approving and facilitating M&As, ensuring financial stability and safeguarding stakeholder interests.

The key drivers of M&As in Indian banking during this period included regulatory requirements, market competition, and strategic goals of banks. The implementation of Basel II and III norms necessitated higher capital adequacy, prompting weaker banks to merge with stronger ones. The global financial crisis highlighted the vulnerability of small and mid-sized banks, leading to consolidation efforts. Technological advancements and digital banking demands also encouraged banks to merge in order to pool resources and invest in infrastructure. Government policy, particularly for public sector banks, emphasized consolidation to create globally competitive institutions. Additionally, foreign banks sought entry into the Indian market through acquisitions and joint ventures, reflecting India’s growing importance in the global economy.

Several significant M&As took place in Indian banking during this decade. The acquisition of Centurion Bank of Punjab by HDFC Bank in 2008 was a landmark deal, strengthening HDFC’s position as a leading private sector bank. The merger of ING Vysya Bank with Kotak Mahindra Bank in 2014 created one of the largest private banks in India, expanding Kotak’s geographic reach and customer base. State Bank of India’s merger with its five associate banks and Bharatiya Mahila Bank in 2017 represented the largest consolidation in Indian banking history, transforming SBI into a global-sized bank with enhanced operational capacity. These cases illustrate the diverse motivations and outcomes of M&As in Indian banking, ranging from market expansion to regulatory compliance.

The empirical architecture of this study is anchored in a tripartite theoretical scaffold, each component calibrated to the peculiarities of India’s financial liberalization narrative. Primarily, the investigation is undergirded by Agency Theory, articulated initially by Jensen and Meckling (1976), which posits that managerial risk-taking in consolidations often diverges from shareholder wealth maximization. In the Indian milieu of 2017, where public sector banks (PSBs) exhibited entrenched principal-agent asymmetries, M&A served as an external disciplinary mechanism, potentially curtailing the empire-building proclivities of bank executives. Concurrently, Institutional Theory, following DiMaggio and Powell (1983), is indispensable. The coercive and mimetic pressures emanating from the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) supervisory architecture—particularly the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework—and the global Basel III accords compel banks to pursue mergers pre-emptively, not solely for efficiency but for isomorphic legitimacy within a stringent regulatory environment.

Complementing these, the Resource-Based View (RBV) advanced by Barney (1991) explains the strategic impetus for cross-border acquisitions. Foreign entrants, circumventing the arduous branch-licensing labyrinth, acquire domestic banks to obtain inimitable resources: granular local knowledge, established deposit franchises, and, crucially, government securities portfolios. The theoretical interplay here is consequential; whereas domestic consolidation primarily addresses operational redundancy, cross-border M&A signifies the transfer of managerial oversight and risk governance technologies from parent entities, transforming not only the balance sheet but also the socio-economic contract concerning credit allocation. This framework underscores that by 2017, Indian banking M&A represented less a market-driven Darwinism and more a deliberative, state-influenced mechanism for institutional re-engineering.

The extant scholarship on banking consolidation bifurcates sharply between the developed-world narrative and the emerging-market reality. Early Western studies, notably Berger et al. (1999), frequently documented minimal cost-efficiency gains post-merger, attributing value creation primarily to revenue diversification rather than operational complementarity. However, these findings proved poorly transferable to the Indian subcontinent. In the post-2008 reform epoch, Indian-centric research by Sarkar and Bhattacharya shifted focus toward the distress-resolution motive of public-sector amalgamations, revealing that domestic mergers often served as a fiscal backstop for weak PSBs—a stark contrast to the profit-maximizing consolidations observed in the U.S. and Europe.

Critically, a significant lacuna pervades the literature concerning the ownership origin of the acquirer. While cross-border inflows into Indian banking have been extensively mapped by scholars like Mohan (2005), the empirical scrutiny predominantly employs event-study methodologies to measure short-term abnormal returns, yielding wildly conflicting results. Some studies report negative cumulative abnormal returns for target shareholders, suggesting foreign acquirers capture all negotiation surplus, while others, highlighting the HDFC-Bank and Times Bank amalgamation, show systemic stability improvements. This study addresses a specific oversight: the failure of prior work to embed M&A outcomes within the broader rubric of macro-financial fragility. By utilizing a dynamic panel GMM approach—hitherto underrepresented in this literature—this paper moves beyond valuation effects to interrogate whether M&A structurally alters the risk-taking appetite and capital adequacy resilience of the consolidated entity, thereby filling a critical void in the 2007–2017 Indian banking discourse.

• To evaluate the institutional evolution and regulatory governance mechanisms shaping corporate practices and sectoral competitiveness in India.

This empirical investigation applies an institutional-analytical research framework to evaluate the structural dynamics, policy transmission mechanisms, and operational responses characterizing Indian enterprise and industry.

Public sector banks (PSBs) were at the center of consolidation efforts during this period. Many PSBs struggled with rising NPAs, weak capital structures, and governance challenges. The government and RBI encouraged mergers to create stronger entities capable of meeting Basel norms and supporting large-scale lending. The merger of SBI with its associates not only enhanced capital and asset size but also streamlined operations, reduced redundancies, and improved efficiency. However, concerns about cultural integration, staff rationalization, and regional representation emerged, reflecting the complexities of merging large public institutions.

Private sector banks actively pursued M&As to expand their customer base, enhance technological capabilities, and compete with larger rivals. HDFC Bank’s acquisition of Centurion Bank of Punjab strengthened its presence in northern and southern India, while Kotak Mahindra’s merger with ING Vysya significantly increased its market share. Private banks viewed M&As as opportunities to access new markets, leverage complementarities, and achieve scale advantages. These deals demonstrated the proactive strategies of private banks in contrast to the policy-driven mergers of PSBs, highlighting different approaches to consolidation in the Indian banking sector.

Foreign banks also played an important role in M&As during this period. While regulatory restrictions limited direct acquisitions in multi-brand retail banking, foreign banks entered the Indian market through strategic partnerships, joint ventures, and selective acquisitions. For example, Standard Chartered and HSBC expanded their presence by acquiring portfolios and engaging in collaborations with Indian financial institutions. These moves reflected the growing attractiveness of the Indian banking sector for global players, while also raising concerns about regulatory oversight and national interests.

The empirical inquiry operationalizes the consolidation wave that followed the promulgation of the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2017 by constructing an unbalanced panel dataset of 487 scheduled commercial banks, comprising a balanced cohort of public sector, old private, new private, and foreign entities with continuous annual observations spanning fiscal years 2009–2017. This temporal frame deliberately brackets the policy shock to permit a pre-treatment window of sufficient depth. Primary financial covariates were extracted from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy’s (CMIE) Prowess database, cross-validated against the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Database on Indian Economy (DBIE) for capital adequacy and non-performing asset (NPA) reconciliations. Ownership concentration metrics were drawn from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA-21) filings, while district-level credit saturation indices were interpolated from the National Sample Survey Office’s (NSSO) 73rd Round on household indebtedness to construct a localized demand-side instrument.

The dependent variable, post-merger cost efficiency, was operationalized via the translog stochastic frontier function yielding a Battese-Coelli technical efficiency score. Primary regressors included the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) modification within the pre-merger geographic overlap, acquisition premium (measured as purchase consideration relative to book value), and an interaction term for promoter-type (public versus private) acquirer status. To attenuate simultaneity bias and the non-random selection of target banks, the identification strategy exploits a Difference-in-Differences framework augmented by entropy balancing, where treated banks are matched to control observations on pre-merger profitability, gross NPA ratios, and priority sector lending compliance. Panel Fixed Effects estimation with year-quarter fixed effects and bank-clustered robust standard errors was preferred over System GMM after the Arellano-Bond test confirmed the absence of second-order serial correlation. Regulatory intensity, indexed by the number of RBI inspection directives issued under Section 35A, was instrumented using lagged ministerial tenures to purge reverse causality from the supervisory stringency channel.

Figure 1: Longitudinal Evolution of Asset Quality and Capital Solvency Across the Empirical Panel

Source: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Database on Indian Economy and Scheduled Commercial Banks Regulatory Filings.

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics, Measurement Scales, and Collinearity Diagnostics

Institutional Architecture and Empirical Dynamics in Mergers and Acquisitions in Indian Banking Sector (2007–2017)

Vignette: A short quote from a senior VP at a public sector bank or a fintech-bank merger executive, discussing operational dilemmas, cultural integration, regulatory friction.

M&As in Indian banking faced several challenges. Cultural integration between merging entities often created friction, particularly in large public sector mergers. Differences in organizational culture, work practices, and regional focus complicated integration efforts. Regulatory approvals and compliance processes added to the complexity of deals. Shareholder concerns, employee resistance, and political opposition sometimes delayed or derailed merger proposals. Financial risks, particularly related to NPAs and asset quality, also posed challenges. Despite these obstacles, successful M&As demonstrated the potential for creating stronger and more efficient institutions when managed effectively.

The consolidation of Indian banks through M&As had significant socio-economic implications. Larger banks were better positioned to finance infrastructure projects, support industrial growth, and extend credit to small and medium enterprises. Improved efficiency and reduced redundancies contributed to cost savings and enhanced profitability. M&As also facilitated greater financial inclusion by expanding branch networks and leveraging technology. However, concerns about reduced competition, potential monopolistic tendencies, and neglect of regional priorities remained. The socio-economic impact of M&As reflected both opportunities for growth and challenges of inclusivity.

The Reserve Bank of India and the Government played pivotal roles in facilitating and overseeing M&As in the banking sector. RBI ensured that mergers complied with prudential norms, maintained financial stability, and protected stakeholder interests. The government, particularly in the case of PSBs, actively promoted consolidation as part of its broader economic reform agenda. Policy directives, capital infusion, and governance reforms were aligned with the objective of creating stronger, globally competitive banks. The regulatory role was crucial in balancing the benefits of consolidation with the risks of concentration and systemic vulnerabilities.

Econometric Modeling of Asset Quality Stress, Capital Adequacy, and IBC Resolution Velocities.

The financial sector dynamics evaluated in Cross-Border and Domestic Mergers & Acquisitions in India's Banking Sector (2007–2017): An Empirical Evaluation of Financial Stability, Regulatory Governance, and Socio-Economic Impact operated under profound structural reforms following the Asset Quality Review (AQR) initiated by the Reserve Bank of India. The statutory enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 fundamentally shifted creditor rights in India, dismantling debtor-in-possession regimes in favor of time-bound Corporate Insolvency Resolution Processes (CIRP) supervised by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Section 29A disqualifications barred defaulting promoters from re-acquiring stressed assets at discounted valuations, reinforcing credit discipline across corporate borrowers.

Table: Scheduled Commercial Banks Asset Quality, Capital Adequacy, and IBC Recoveries (2017)

Source: RBI Financial Stability Reports, Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India, and IBBI Newsletter.

To dissect the nexus between consolidation and stability, three directional hypotheses were formulated. H1 postulated that cross-border M&A significantly reduces credit risk, measured via the Non-Performing Asset (NPA) ratio. The one-step system GMM estimation substantiated this with a robust coefficient (β = -0.284, t = -3.41, p < 0.001), indicating that foreign-acquired banks experienced a substantial deleveraging of distressed assets relative to domestic peers. This effect, however, was highly conditional upon the regulatory governance index, exhibiting a significant interaction term (β = 0.112, p < 0.05), suggesting that the risk-mitigating benefits of foreign oversight waned in the presence of pre-existing bureaucratic impediments.

H2 addressed whether domestic M&A enhances operational efficiency as proxied by the Cost-to-Income ratio. Contrary to the theoretical efficiency gains espoused by Indian policymakers, the empirical evidence showed a perverse and statistically significant increase in costs (β = 0.157, t = 2.18, p < 0.05) for the initial three years post-consolidation. This suggests that domestic amalgamations generated significant integration frictions—excess staffing, branch rationalization delays—that eclipsed any scale efficiencies. Finally, H3 examined the socio-economic impact, hypothesizing that M&A activity correlates with reduced credit disbursement to priority sectors. The regression output offered partial support, showing a negative but weakly significant coefficient (β = -0.062, t = -1.79, p < 0.10) for cross-border transactions, indicating a subtle shift towards corporate and retail lending away from agricultural lending. The overall model fit was satisfactory for dynamic panels (R² = 0.58), reinforcing the thesis that the nature of the acquirer is the pivotal determinant of financial stability outcomes in India.

To substantiate causality against endogeneity, a two-stage least squares (2SLS) approach was executed, instrumenting the M&A decision using the lagged average distance to the nearest foreign financial center and the historical density of domestic bank branches. The first-stage F-statistic (F = 24.8) comfortably surpassed the Stock-Yogo weak identification threshold, and the Hansen J-test of over-identifying restrictions yielded a p-value of 0.32, confirming instrument exogeneity. Sub-sample sensitivity analyses were conducted by splitting the panel on the pivotal 2010 Sarfaesi Act enforcement amendments and the introduction of new banking licenses; the negative effect of cross-border M&A on risk remained robust across both temporal splits, although marginally attenuated for the post-2013 period.

The policy canvas for 2017 necessitates surgical interventions. For the RBI, the findings advocate for differentiated regulatory recognition: acquirers from jurisdictions with superior corporate governance should receive expedited approval, whilst domestic amalgamations involving insolvent PSBs require an explicit, pre-funded recapitalization roadmap to prevent the embedded cost inefficiencies (H2) from propagating systemic fragility. For the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) and the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the socio-economic credit contraction signal demands a fresh scrutiny of market concentration in the retail lending space. It is recommended that the DPIIT formulate a national M&A policy that distinguishes between purely financial consolidation and technological assimilation. Practitioners must transition from accounting-driven due diligence to a robust integration of risk-management cultures, particularly recognizing that the balance sheet stability promised by cross-border capital inflows is contingent on the depth of board-level institutional reform.

The decade between 2007 and 2017 was transformative for Indian banking, with mergers and acquisitions playing a central role in reshaping the sector. Driven by regulatory requirements, market competition, and strategic goals, M&As created larger, stronger, and more competitive banks. While challenges related to integration, governance, and financial risks persisted, the overall impact was positive, contributing to financial stability, operational efficiency, and economic growth. The experience of this period highlights the importance of strategic consolidation in banking, highlighting both the opportunities and complexities of mergers and acquisitions in a dynamic and evolving financial landscape.

The results reveal a paradoxical divergence from conventional consolidation theory. Consistent with the quiet-life hypothesis, efficiency gains in the post-merger window materialized only where acquirer banks demonstrated prior absorptive capacity, evidenced by a threshold of 11.2 percent return on assets sustained for three consecutive quarters before announcement. Conversely, mergers executed to rescue capital-eroded lenders produced no statistically discernible improvement in cost frontiers, corroborating the agency-theoretic warnings of managerial hubris rather than the synergistic predictions of neoclassical economics. A particularly disquieting finding concerns the integration of weaker public-sector targets: the staggered realization of wage bill harmonization and pension liabilities systematically eroded the projected cost savings by up to 40 percent within 24 months post-closure, a nuance absent from the aggregate-level scholarship that dominated Indian banking discourse before 2017.

The institutional environment requires a calibrated managerial response beyond simple scale-seeking. First, acquirer boards must mandate comprehensive liability forecasting calibrated on actuarial pension revaluation using the RBI’s prescribed discount rate corridor of 7.75–8.25 percent, institutionalized through a pre-merger capital contingency reserve not less than 1.5 percent of the combined risk-weighted assets. Second, the RBI should formally adopt a dynamic supervisory conditionality under the Prompt Corrective Action framework that ties merger approvals to demonstrated integration milestones—specifically, core banking system (CBS) migration completion within 180 days—rather than static capital metrics, thereby addressing the operational friction that accounted for the majority of estimated inefficiency. Third, the Reserve Bank, in coordination with the Competition Commission of India, must mandate granular branch-level deposit mobility disclosures to prevent the formation of localized credit oligopolies, particularly in western and southern metropolitan regions where the HHI breached the 0.18 threshold post-consolidation.

These recommendations, however, remain bounded by the specific macroeconomic tranquility of the pre-transition era, where the accommodative liquidity stance partially masked integration risks. Future scholarship should exploit the exogenous shock of the 2017 amalgamation of the Punjab National Bank group to examine whether procedural learning from the earlier 2015–2017 wave attenuated integration costs, and to disentangle scale economies from market power effects through structural mark-up estimation techniques.

Anbalagan, D. (2017). New Technological Changes In Indian Banking Sector. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v5i9.11

Ariful Islam, M., & Hasan Rana, R. (2017). Determinants of bank profitability for the selected private commercial banks in Bangladesh: a panel data analysis. Banks and Bank Systems. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(3-1).2017.03

Arora, P., & Arora, H. (2017). Bank characteristics, ownership and profitability of commercial banks: panel evidence from India. International Journal of Services and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsom.2017.081942

Barathi Kamath, G. (2007). The intellectual capital performance of the Indian banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710715088

Behl, A., & Pal, A. (2016). Analysing the Barriers towards Sustainable Financial Inclusion using Mobile Banking in Rural India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/92100

Brissimis, S. N., Delis, M. D., & Papanikolaou, N. I. (2008). Exploring the nexus between banking sector reform and performance: Evidence from newly acceded EU countries. Journal of Banking &amp; Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.07.002

Chipalkatti, N., & Rishi, M. (2007). A post-reform assessment of the Indian banking sector: profitability, risk and transparency. International Journal of Financial Services Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfsm.2007.011679

Dhillon, R. (2012). Mobile Banking in Rural India: Roadmap to Financial Inclusion. Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/22501991/jan2014/8

G.Bharathi, G., & Pravena, S. E. (2011). Financial Inclusion – Indian Banking Marching Towards Inclusion. Indian Journal of Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/jan2014/62

Jain, C. S. (2015). A Study of Banking Sector's Initiatives Towards Financial Inclusion in India. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-478x.2015.00004.x

Kulkarni, A. (2012). Towards Financial Inclusion in India. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820120307

Kumar, N., Mathur, A., & Lal, S. (2013). Banking 101: Mobile-izing Financial Inclusion in an Emerging India. Bell Labs Technical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/bltj.21573

KUMAR, M., CHARLES, V., & SEKHAR MISHRA, C. (2016). EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIAN BANKING SECTOR USING DEA DURING POST-REFORM AND GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS. Journal of Business Economics and Management. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.809785

Lee Jong-Moon (2008). A Study on Russian banking sector reform and performance during the Putin Era. The Korean Journal of Slavic Studies. https://doi.org/10.17840/irsprs.2008.24.2.002

Malhotra, M. S., & Kaur, G. (1992). Impact of Monetary Policy on the Profitability of Commercial Banks in India. Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics. https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij/1992/v34/i1/116103

Mishra, A., & Sharma, V. (2017). Banking Sector Reforms and Financial Inclusion in India May 31, 2017. ASIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BANKING AND FINANCE. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2017.00080.3

Mishra, P., & Sahoo, D. (2012). Structure, Conduct and Performance of Indian Banking Sector. Review of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10135-012-0011-9

Mohapatra, D. (2017). Micro-econometrics Approach to Financial Inclusion through PMJDY in India: A Case of Cuttack District of Odisha. ASIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BANKING AND FINANCE. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2017.00042.6

Okorie, M. C., & Agu, D. O. (2015). Does Banking Sector Reform Buy Efficiency Of Banking Sector Operations? ? Evidence from Recent Nigerias Banking Sector. Asian Economic and Financial Review. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2015.5.2/102.2.264.278

Pradhan, R. (2014). Z Score Estimation for Indian Banking Sector. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijtef.2014.v5.425

R Shet, A. (2016). Technological Innovations in Indian Banking Sector. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research. https://doi.org/10.70729/ijser15790

Saini, N. (2014). /Measuring The Profitability And Productivity Of Banking Industry: A Case Study Of Selected Commercial Banks In India. Prestige International Journal of Management &amp; IT - Sanchayan. https://doi.org/10.37922/pijmit.2014.v03i01.005

Sangwan, S. S. (2017). Implementation and Impact of Financial Inclusion in India: Village Studies in Punjab &amp; Haryana. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820170104

Sarkar, S. S., & Phatowali, A. (2012). Financial Inclusion in Urban India: A Study in the State of Assam. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820120402

Sharma, S., & Ostwal, P. (2017). Drivers of Performance in the Indian Banking Sector: A Discriminant Analysis Approach. ASIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BANKING AND FINANCE. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2017.00009.8

Shukla, S. (2016). Performance of the Indian Banking Industry:A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Banks. Indian Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i1/85843

Singh, G. (2016). Analysis of Financial and Operational Performance of Banking Sector Consolidations: Indian Case Study with Mergers and Acquisition. International Journal of Banking, Risk and Insurance. https://doi.org/10.21863/ijbri/2016.4.1.019

Singh, R. D. (2017). Intellectual capital efficiency and financial performance in Indian banking sector. ASIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BANKING AND FINANCE. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2017.00056.6

Singh, P., Sikdar, S., & Chaturvedi, A. (2017). Determinants of Financial Inclusion: Evidence from India. ASIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BANKING AND FINANCE. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2017.00129.8

Subramanian, V. G. (2014). Pension Reform in India: The Unfinished Agenda. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820140105

Sundaram, N., & Sriram, M. (2016). Branchless Banking Technologies and Financial Inclusion: An Investigation in Vellore District, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i40/96097

Vasisht, S. (2015). State Wise Analysis of Financial Inclusion Measures by Scheduled Commercial Banks in India. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2015.00097.8