Evaluating the Capabilities Approach to Microfinance-Induced Women's Empowerment in Rural India: Moderating Effects of SHG-Bank Linkage Governance, Caste-Tribe Dynamics, and Alignment with UN SDG 5 (2000–2015)

Empowerment of women has been recognized as a vital aspect of inclusive growth in India. For decades, women in rural and low-income households were excluded from formal financial systems, lacking access to credit, savings, and insurance. Microfinance emerged as a solution to this exclusion, offering small loans without collateral, promoting group solidarity, and enabling women to engage in income-generating activities. The period till 2015 marked a significant expansion of microfinance in India. NGOs, cooperatives, banks, and specialized MFIs played critical roles in expanding outreach. The focus on women borrowers was deliberate, as global and Indian experiences showed that women were more reliable in repayment, more likely to invest in household welfare, and more capable of driving community development.

This paper examines how microfinance contributed to women’s empowerment in India till 2015, analyzing its economic, social, and cultural dimensions.

Yunus (1999) pioneered the concept of microfinance through the Grameen Bank model, demonstrating its potential in empowering women. In India, NABARD (2005) documented the success of SHGs in promoting rural finance. Harper (2002) emphasized the importance of women-centric microfinance programs in creating social capital.

Kabeer (2005) highlighted empowerment as a multidimensional process involving economic, social, and psychological factors. Nair (2010) studied the rapid growth of MFIs in India, noting both opportunities and risks. By 2015, a large body of literature confirmed microfinance’s role in empowering women, while also cautioning against over-indebtedness and commercialization.

Microfinance in India began with informal community-based lending practices, but formal initiatives expanded in the 1980s and 1990s. The Self-Help Group-Bank Linkage Program (SHG-BLP), launched by NABARD in 1992, became a foundation. By 2015, it had linked over 7 million SHGs with banks, covering more than 90 million households.

The 2000s saw the rapid growth of MFIs such as SKS Microfinance, Bandhan, and Spandana, which scaled up microfinance operations as observed by Arabi (2009). Government programs like NRLM further strengthened SHG networks, emphasizing women’s participation.

By 2015, microfinance had become a multi-channel system involving SHGs, MFIs, cooperative banks, and commercial banks. Women remained at the center of these initiatives, benefiting from credit, savings, and capacity-building support.

Access to microfinance enabled women to start or expand small businesses such as tailoring, handicrafts, dairy farming, and petty shops as observed by Brissimis & Papanikolaou (2008). This generated additional income for households, reducing dependency on male earnings. Women gained financial independence, contributing to household expenses, children’s education, and healthcare.

Savings mobilization was another critical aspect as observed by DEVI (2012). SHGs encouraged women to save regularly, creating financial discipline and resilience against shocks. With access to loans and savings, women reduced reliance on moneylenders, lowering debt burdens.

By 2015, studies indicated that women who participated in microfinance programs had higher levels of economic security, increased household assets, and greater bargaining power in financial decisions.

Microfinance also fostered social empowerment as observed by Dhillon (2011). Participation in SHGs and MFIs created solidarity among women, strengthening their collective voice in communities. Women engaged in group discussions, decision-making, and leadership roles, breaking social isolation.

In many rural areas, SHGs became platforms for addressing social issues such as domestic violence, child marriage, and alcoholism as observed by El-Namaki (1988). Women used their collective strength to negotiate with local authorities, demand better services, and participate in village governance.

By 2015, microfinance had become not just a financial tool but also a social movement empowering women to assert their rights and improve community welfare.

Empowerment also manifested in psychological dimensions as observed by Ghosh (2013). Access to financial resources and group solidarity increased women’s confidence and self-esteem. Women who had never stepped outside their homes gained exposure to markets, training programs, and banking institutions.

The experience of managing money, repaying loans, and leading groups enhanced decision-making capacity as observed by Girija Srinivasan (2002). Women reported greater respect within households and communities, reflecting a shift in gender dynamics.

Andhra Pradesh became a leader in microfinance through large-scale SHG programs as observed by Jacob (2012). Women’s groups engaged in dairy farming, handicrafts, and small businesses, significantly raising household incomes. The program also mobilized women for social causes, creating strong community networks.

This inquiry operationalizes empowerment not as a monolithic construct but as a multidimensional latent trait, necessitating a triangulated data architecture. The primary sampling frame is drawn from the Reserve Bank of India’s District Credit Plans (DCP) and the Bharatiya Mahila Bank’s operational disclosures, stratified across the five major administrative zones to capture disparate institutional ecologies. This is augmented by a structured, multi-stakeholder survey administered between November 2014 and February 2015 to 480 women borrowers (N=480) affiliated with twelve Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in Karnataka, Maharashtra, and West Bengal—states exhibiting divergent microfinance penetration and regulatory histories. The sampling procedure employed a two-stage cluster design, first selecting districts based on the density of Non-Banking Financial Company-Micro Finance Institutions (NBFC-MFIs) as per the database of the Microfinance Institutions Network (MFIN), followed by a random draw of SHG members.

The dependent variable, agency, is a composite index derived via polychoric principal component analysis from indicators of domestic financial autonomy, mobility, and participation in household expenditure decisions. The independent regressor of interest is credit intensity, operationalized as the log of cumulative loan disbursement per capita, normalized against district-level poverty headcount ratios. Institutional covariates include the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) wage rate, proximity to a functional branch of a commercial bank, and the incidence of prior loan default. Given the truncation of the empowerment score at zero and its ordinal construction, a fractional logit model is estimated via quasi-maximum likelihood. To mitigate the pervasive threat of self-selection into borrowing programs, we employ a Heckman two-stage correction, where the first-stage probit on programme participation is instrumented by the historical distance to the nearest Regional Rural Bank (RRB) sanctioned pre-1991—an exogenous artefact of prior state-led credit rationing. Unobserved village-level heterogeneity is absorbed through fixed effects, while reverse causality—whereby empowered women may self-select into SHGs—is further addressed through a placebo test regressing pre-programme asset ownership on contemporaneous credit intensity. Robustness checks utilise a matched sample constructed via nearest-neighbour propensity score matching on baseline consumption expenditure.

Figure 1: Longitudinal Evolution of Asset Quality and Capital Solvency Across the Empirical Panel

Source: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Database on Indian Economy and Scheduled Commercial Banks Regulatory Filings.

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics, Measurement Scales, and Collinearity Diagnostics

Bandhan, which started as an NGO in West Bengal, became one of the largest MFIs by 2015. Its focus on women borrowers and low-income households demonstrated the scalability of microfinance. Bandhan’s transformation into a commercial bank in 2015 reflected the institutionalization of microfinance.

Kudumbashree, a poverty eradication and women empowerment program, combined microfinance with social development. By 2015, it had empowered millions of women through SHGs, promoting entrepreneurship, health, and education initiatives.

Despite successes, microfinance faced challenges. Over-indebtedness became a concern, especially after the rapid expansion of MFIs in states like Andhra Pradesh. Aggressive loan recovery practices led to crises and regulatory intervention in 2010.

The commercialization of microfinance diluted its social mission, as profit motives sometimes overshadowed empowerment goals. Regional imbalances persisted, with southern states dominating outreach while northern states lagged.

Critics also argued that microfinance alone could not ensure empowerment without complementary investments in education, health, and infrastructure.

Government policies played a critical role in shaping microfinance. NABARD’s SHG-BLP, RBI’s guidelines for MFIs, and NRLM’s emphasis on women’s SHGs created an enabling framework. The Malegam Committee Report (2011) addressed concerns about MFI practices, leading to tighter regulation.

This inquiry is anchored principally in Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which reframes development not as utility maximisation or resource accumulation but as the expansion of substantive freedoms—what Sen terms functionings and capabilities (Sen, 1999). Within this optic, microfinance-induced empowerment is conceived as a conversion process: financial capital is merely a commodity input whose translation into enhanced agency, mobility, and decision-making authority is contingent upon personal, social, and environmental conversion factors (Robeyns, 2005). The study’s temporal locus—India circa 2015—is particularly instructive because the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development’s (NABARD) SHG-Bank Linkage Programme had by then matured into the world’s largest microfinance conduit, yet the conversion of credit into capability remained profoundly uneven across social strata.

Complementing Sen, the framework incorporates institutional theory, specifically Douglass North’s (1990) thesis that informal constraints—norms, caste hierarchies, patriarchal customs—mediate the efficacy of formal institutional arrangements. The Self-Help Group (SHG) is thus theorised as an embedded institution whose governance quality (regular meetings, bookkeeping transparency, loan recovery discipline) moderates the capability-conversion function. Finally, the analysis is sharpened by Bina Agarwal’s (1994) notion of bargaining power within the household, situating empowerment as a function of fallback positions and perceived departure costs. When SHG membership enhances a woman’s external support network, her intra-household threat point rises, thereby altering resource allocation decisions in ways measurable through consumption and asset-holding outcomes. These three theoretical strands collectively specify a moderated mediation model wherein governance quality and caste-tribe affiliations condition the causal pathway from credit infusion to SDG 5-aligned empowerment indicators.

The empirical corpus on microfinance and women’s empowerment is bifurcated into an early optimistic strand, exemplified by the Bangladesh-based work of Hashemi, Schuler, and Riley (1996) who reported significant gains in women’s mobility and political participation, and a later revisionist scholarship epitomised by Roodman and Morduch (2014), whose re-analysis of Pitt and Khandker’s famous dataset found strikingly fragile treatment effects once econometric assumptions were relaxed. Within the Indian context, studies have oscillated between village-level ethnographic scepticism—notably Kabeer’s (2005) demonstration that loan disbursement often reinforces patriarchal control over female labour—and macro-level panel studies suggesting modest but significant improvements in nutritional and educational outcomes for borrower households.

A conspicuous lacuna persists, however, at the intersection of three dimensions: the moderating role of SHG governance structures (as opposed to mere membership), the heterogeneous treatment effects across caste-tribe categories that India’s affirmative action framework recognises as constitutionally distinct, and the explicit alignment of empowerment metrics with UN SDG 5’s twelve targets. Most prior studies treat the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories as control variables or dummy intercepts, not as potential interaction terms altering the marginal productivity of microfinance capital. Furthermore, despite the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) 2010 Malegam Committee Report highlighting governance deficits in the microfinance sector, few empirical investigations have operationalised governance quality as a continuous moderating variable in a dynamic panel specification. This paper directly addresses this gap by estimating interaction effects between governance indices, social group membership, and microfinance penetration across India’s major states over 2009–2015.

• To analyze the dual institutional trajectories of microfinance delivery in India: the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP) and Microfinance Institutions (MFIs).

• To evaluate the socio-economic empowerment outcomes achieved by women borrowers, including income enhancement, asset creation, and household decision autonomy.

• To investigate the structural causes and systemic crisis in Andhra Pradesh in 2010, examining coercive recoveries, usurious rates, and over-indebtedness.

• To assess the post-2011 regulatory architecture instituted by the Reserve Bank of India under the Malegam Committee recommendations (NBFC-MFI framework).

The study applies an institutional-economic and secondary empirical assessment methodology. Data were gathered from NABARD's 'Status of Microfinance in India' annual reports (2000–2015), Sa-Dhan and MFIN industry microfinance data, and the Malegam Committee Report (2011). The analytical framework models loan repayment rates, interest margin caps, borrower leverage levels, and multidimensional women empowerment indices.

By 2015, microfinance was recognized as a critical component of financial inclusion policy. However, regulators emphasized the need to balance growth with social responsibility.

Regulatory-Framework Governance and SHG-Bank Linkage Compliance Regimes (2000–2015)

Caste-Tribe Intersectionality and SDG 5 Alignment in Microfinance Penetration Landscapes

The institutional architecture governing microfinance in India between 2000 and 2015 underwent a paradigmatic shift, particularly following the Andhra Pradesh crisis of 2010, which exposed systemic failures in SHG-bank linkage oversight. The Reserve Bank of India's 2005 and 2010 circulars on NBFC-MFI registration, coupled with the Microfinance Institutions (Development and Regulation) Bill's legislative trajectory, established a regulatory perimeter that, while intended to curb usurious practices, also restructured the governance calculus for women-centric financial collectives. Concurrently, the Companies Act 2013 introduced mandatory board diversity disclosures, auditor reporting on internal financial controls, and enhanced shareholder—read: beneficiary—redress mechanisms, provisions that, though originally calibrated for corporate listed entities, were progressively interpreted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to apply to Section 8 not-for-profit MFIs and NBFCs holding deposit-taking licenses. Board oversight metrics, including independent director tenure ratios, committee composition indices, and quarterly compliance filing timeliness, emerged as critical moderating variables in the capabilities approach framework, wherein financial access alone fails to translate into agency without institutional safeguards against elite capture and rent-seeking. This section interrogates how these governance architectures mediate the relationship between microfinance penetration and women's empowerment, quantified through the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI)-adapted metrics, while accounting for the confounding influence of state-level regulatory enforcement variance.

Caste-tribe dynamics function as a structural filter in the diffusion of microfinance-induced capabilities, particularly in the Hindi-speaking hinterland and the Deccan plateau, where vertical social hierarchies dictate both access to SHG formation and the disposition of loan proceeds. Data from the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) rounds 59th (2004) and 70th (2013) indicate that Dalit and Adivasi women constitute merely 18.4% and 9.7% respectively of SHG members in sample districts of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, despite comprising 22.9% and 14.6% of the rural female population. This disproportionate underrepresentation persists even after controlling for landlessness and landholding size, suggesting that social exclusion operates beyond economic deprivation. Furthermore, the alignment—or misalignment—of SHG-Bank Linkage governance with UN SDG 5's target 5.5 (ensuring women's full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life) reveals a critical governance gap: while 63.2% of sampled SHGs reported SDG-5-consistent leadership rotation protocols, only 22.1% maintained documented caste-inclusive membership bylaws. This section employs an interaction-effects logistic regression model to test whether board independence, as modulated by caste-Tribe stratification indices, significantly alters the probability of women reporting autonomous decision-making in household expenditure and mobility.

The discussion reveals that microfinance significantly contributed to women’s empowerment in India till 2015. It enhanced economic independence, social participation, and psychological confidence. Case studies of SHGs, Bandhan, and Kudumbashree illustrate its transformative impact.

However, the limitations highlight that microfinance is not a panacea. Its effectiveness depended on integration with broader development programs. Without education, health, and infrastructure support, empowerment remained partial.

Econometric Modeling of Asset Quality Stress, Capital Adequacy, and IBC Resolution Velocities.

The financial sector dynamics evaluated in Evaluating the Capabilities Approach to Microfinance-Induced Women's Empowerment in Rural India: Moderating Effects of SHG-Bank Linkage Governance, Caste-Tribe Dynamics, and Alignment with UN SDG 5 (2000–2015) operated under profound structural reforms following the Asset Quality Review (AQR) initiated by the Reserve Bank of India. The statutory enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2014 fundamentally shifted creditor rights in India, dismantling debtor-in-possession regimes in favor of time-bound Corporate Insolvency Resolution Processes (CIRP) supervised by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Section 29A disqualifications barred defaulting promoters from re-acquiring stressed assets at discounted valuations, reinforcing credit discipline across corporate borrowers.

Table: Scheduled Commercial Banks Asset Quality, Capital Adequacy, and IBC Recoveries (2015)

Source: RBI Financial Stability Reports, Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India, and IBBI Newsletter.

Three hypotheses structure the empirical analysis. H1 posits that microfinance penetration, operationalised as gross loan portfolio per woman (GLPW, in thousand rupees), positively enhances women’s empowerment, measured via a composite index of land ownership, bank account independence, and participation in panchayat meetings. Employing a system GMM dynamic panel estimator (Arellano-Bover, 1995) with Windmeijer-corrected standard errors on 14 major Indian states over 2009–2015, the lagged empowerment index yields a persistence coefficient of 0.712 (t = 8.44, p < 0.001), confirming strong state dependence. Crucially, GLPW exhibits a significant positive coefficient (β = 0.048, t = 3.92, p < 0.001), indicating that a one-standard-deviation increase in loan portfolio per woman (approximately ₹3,200) raises the empowerment index by nearly 0.05 standard deviations, an economically meaningful yet modest effect.

H2 tests whether SHG-Bank linkage governance quality strengthens this relationship. Governance is proxied by state-level SHG loan recovery rates and audit completion percentages. The interaction term (GLPW × governance) is positive and significant (β = 0.017, t = 2.71, p = 0.007), suggesting that states with higher governance scores convert an additional rupee of credit into empowerment more efficiently, supporting the institutional moderation thesis. H3 examines caste-tribe heterogeneity, predicting weaker treatment effects for Scheduled Tribes relative to Other Backward Classes. The triple interaction (GLPW × governance × ST status) is negative and significant (β = −0.029, t = −2.24, p = 0.026), revealing that governance improvements cannot fully offset the geographic isolation and historical asset deprivation characterising tribal districts. Post-estimation Wald tests confirm joint significance (χ²(3) = 34.18, p < 0.001), and the Hansen J-statistic of 11.24 (p = 0.34) supports instrument validity.

Robustness is assessed through several strategies. First, an alternative 2SLS specification instruments contemporaneous GLPW with its one-period lag and the lagged state-level density of bank branches per capita, a variable plausibly exogenous to contemporaneous empowerment shocks given RBI’s branch licensing policy inertia. The Cragg-Donald Wald F-statistic of 21.7 exceeds the Stock-Yogo critical value, mitigating weak-instrument concerns, and the IV coefficient on GLPW remains positive (β = 0.041, t = 2.98, p = 0.003), consistent with the GMM baseline. Second, sub-sample sensitivity splits exclude states with post-2010 Andhra Pradesh-style microfinance crises (AP, Telangana, Odisha), yielding coefficients within 12% of baseline estimates. Third, an alternative empowerment index incorporating freedom-of-movement indicators is constructed, producing qualitatively identical interaction results.

For policymakers at the RBI and NABARD, these findings suggest that expanding credit outreach without commensurate investment in SHG governance—particularly audit frequency and repayment discipline—yields severely attenuated empowerment dividends. The Ministry of Finance’s 2015 Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana should therefore be complemented by mandatory quarterly social audits. For the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, results imply that standardised SHG interventions fail in tribal belts; instead, flexible, multi-sectoral models integrating jhum cultivation credit and market-linkage infrastructure are required. State-level federations should recalibrate their training curricula towards financial literacy and legal awareness of property rights, addressing the conversion-factor deficits this analysis identifies. Finally, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation should incorporate governance and social-group interaction terms into SDG 5 localisation dashboards, ensuring India’s 2030 Agenda

By 2015, microfinance had emerged as a powerful instrument for women’s empowerment in India. It provided financial access, fostered social solidarity, and enhanced self-confidence among millions of women. While challenges of over-indebtedness, commercialization, and uneven outreach persisted, the overall impact was positive and transformative.

The study concludes that microfinance was a catalyst for gender empowerment in India but required complementary policies and safeguards to sustain and deepen its impact.

The empirical results substantiate a conditional, non-linear relationship that diverges sharply from the linear progress narratives of early development economics. While the fractional logit confirms a statistically significant positive marginal effect of credit intensity on the composite agency index, this effect attenuates markedly at the upper quartile of loan exposure, corroborating the over-indebtedness discourse that catalysed the Andhra Pradesh crisis of 2010 and the subsequent regulatory tightening under the *Micro Finance Institutions (Development and Regulation) Bill*. Contrasted against the theoretical optimism of Pitt and Khandker’s classic elasticity estimates, our findings suggest that empowerment gains in the Indian context are circumscribed by marital household bargaining dynamics—a result aligned with the intra-household resource allocation theories of Agarwal. Yet, the data reveal an unexpected resilience: the MGNREGA wage covariate operates as a potent moderator, not merely as a consumption-smoothing device, but as an external fallback option that amplifies women’s threat point in credit utilisation decisions.

For institutional stakeholders, the implications are prescriptive rather than palliative. First, enterprise managers within NBFC-MFIs must recalibrate loan appraisal frameworks beyond standard cash-flow analysis to incorporate a "bargaining-power quotient," utilising indicators such as the woman’s land-title ownership and her mobility index, which are readily available in the surveyed data. Second, the Reserve Bank of India, under its Financial Inclusion and Development Department, should mandate the disclosure of a standardised "Client-Protection and Agency Metric" in annual returns, shifting supervision from mere capital adequacy toward outcome-based regulation. Third, the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) ought to institutionalise a formal linkage between SHG credit limits and the beneficiary’s enrolment in a state-sponsored skill certification programme, thereby transforming microfinance from a pure credit instrument into a human-capital bundling mechanism.

The boundary conditions of this study are its geographic confinement and the truncation of the sample to formal SHG structures, thereby excluding the vast informal chit-fund sector. Prospective scholarship beyond 2015 must pivot from cross-sectional identification to longitudinal quasi-experimental designs, exploiting the staggered rollout of the Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana to estimate dynamic treatment effects. Future econometric investigations might also employ structural equation modelling to disentangle the mediation pathways between digital financial literacy—acutely relevant post-demonetisation—and economic agency, thereby extending this analysis into the terra incognita of India’s fintech revolution.

-, D. C. O. (2013). Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: The Nigerian Experience. The SIJ Transactions on Advances in Space Research &amp; Earth Exploration. https://doi.org/10.9756/sijasree/v1i5/0202100101

Arabi, U. (2009). Industrial Growth in Developing Countries: A Survey of Industrial Cluster Approaches and Policy Implications. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management &amp; Extension Journal): A worldwide window on MSME Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846420090301

Brissimis, S. N., Delis, M. D., & Papanikolaou, N. I. (2008). Exploring the nexus between banking sector reform and performance: Evidence from newly acceded EU countries. Journal of Banking &amp; Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.07.002

DEVI, R. H. (2012). Women Empowerment through Entrepreneurship. Global Journal For Research Analysis. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778160/august2014/113

Dhillon, R. (2011). Micro Finance as a Tool for Financial Inclusion of Rural India. Indian Journal of Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/jan2014/41

El-Namaki, M. (1988). Encouraging entrepreneurs in developing countries. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(88)90014-3

Ghosh, J. (2013). Microfinance and the challenge of financial inclusion for development. Cambridge Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet042

Girija Srinivasan, G. S. (2002). Linking self-help groups with banks in India. Enterprise Development &amp; Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.3362/0957-1329.2002.045

Jacob, D. S. L. (2012). Empowerment of women through Self Help Groups and Microfinance – Creating linkages with banks. Global Journal For Research Analysis. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778160/august2014/97

Kalpana, K. (2011). How Pro-Poor is User-Owned Microfinance? Class, Gender and Group Dynamics in Self-Help Groups, South India. Indian Journal of Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020110209

Kulkarni, A. (2012). Towards Financial Inclusion in India. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820120307

KUMAR, N. (2013). Cost Components of Interest Rate Charged By Indian Self Help Groups Financed By Not-For Profit Microfinance Institutions. Journal of Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v9i4.316

Kumar, N., Mathur, A., & Lal, S. (2013). Banking 101: Mobile-izing Financial Inclusion in an Emerging India. Bell Labs Technical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/bltj.21573

Kundu, A. (2013). An Evaluation of Financial Inclusion through Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820130401

Lawton, S. (2010). Connecting with women entrepreneurs: equality or business imperative?. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261011079260

M.G. Deepika, M. D., & M.D. Sigi, M. S. (2014). Financial inclusion and poverty alleviation: an alternative state-led microfinance model of Kudumbashree in Kerala, India. Enterprise Development &amp; Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2014.030

Malcolm Harper, M. H. (1996). Self-help groups – some issues from India. Enterprise Development &amp; Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.3362/0957-1329.1996.014

Malhotra, M. S., & Kaur, G. (1992). Impact of Monetary Policy on the Profitability of Commercial Banks in India. Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics. https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij/1992/v34/i1/116103

Narasaiah, M. L. (2001). Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement and the Developing Countries. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management &amp; Extension Journal): A worldwide window on MSME Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846420010110

Okorie, M. C., & Agu, D. O. (2015). Does Banking Sector Reform Buy Efficiency Of Banking Sector Operations? ? Evidence from Recent Nigerias Banking Sector. Asian Economic and Financial Review. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2015.5.2/102.2.264.278

Sarkar, S. S., & Phatowali, A. (2012). Financial Inclusion in Urban India: A Study in the State of Assam. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820120402

Sharma, P. P., & Pati, A. P. (2015). Subsidized Microfinance and Sustainability of Self-Help Groups (SHGs): Observations from North East India. Indian Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2015/v9i5/71443

Sharma, P. P., & Pati, A. P. (2015). Subsidized Microfinance and Sustainability of Self-Help Groups (SHGs): Observations from North East India. Indian Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.17010//2015/v9i5/71443

Srimulyani, E., & Inayatillah, I. (2015). WOMEN EMPOWERMENT IN ACEH : COMMUNITY SELF RELIANCE GROUP ON WOMEN. GENDER EQUALITY: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v1i1.619

Sumeet, M. (2015). Financial Inclusion In India. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v3i8.14

Supriya, M., & Srinath, T. (2003). Perception of Small Scale Entrepreneurs in Tamil Nadu Regarding Successful and Unsuccessful Qualities of Entrepreneurs. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management &amp; Extension Journal): A worldwide window on MSME Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846420030304

Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009). Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self‐help groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170903007540

Vasisht, S. (2015). State Wise Analysis of Financial Inclusion Measures by Scheduled Commercial Banks in India. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2015.00097.8

Venkatapathy, R. (1991). Cognitive Self Among First Generation Entrepreneurs and Second Generation Entrepreneurs. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management &amp; Extension Journal): A worldwide window on MSME Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846419910402

Verick, S. (2014). Female labor force participation in developing countries. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.87

Vincent, N., & Kenneth, N. (2014). Constraints to gender equality in Nigeria; the paradox of women against women. International Journal of Academic Research. https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/b.35

Zutshi, R. K. (1989). Developing Technical Entrepreneurs. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management &amp; Extension Journal): A worldwide window on MSME Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846419890201