Role of Microfinance in Women’s Empowerment Evidence from India (Up to 2018)

1 Doctoral Scholar, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom
2 Professor of Management Studies, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Corresponding Author: o.sinclair@jbs.cam.ac.uk

Women’s empowerment has emerged as a central goal of development policy in India.

The investigation into microfinance’s capacity for female empowerment necessitates a tripartite theoretical lens that transcends the conventional narratives of capital accessibility. Primarily, the analysis is anchored in the Feminist Empowerment Framework articulated by Naila Kabeer (1999), which posits empowerment as a dialectical process of gaining the ability to make strategic life choices. Within this paradigm, microfinance functions not merely as a credit conduit but as a catalyst for altering the ‘rules of the game’ regarding resource distribution within the patriarchal household. Concurrently, Institutional Theory, particularly the sociological variant advanced by DiMaggio and Powell (1983), provides a critical counterweight. Here, the coercive and normative isomorphic pressures exerted by the Indian state—manifested through the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM) and Self-Help Group (SHG)-Bank linkage programs—shape organizational legitimacy. However, in 2018, the institutional environment was fraught with paradox; the regulatory tightening by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Non-Banking Financial Company-Microfinance Institutions (NBFC-MFIs) following the 2010 Andhra Pradesh crisis induced a risk-averse posture that often prioritized repayment discipline over feminist mobilization. Furthermore, Agency Theory, viewed from a stewardship perspective, explains the problematic dynamics between the microfinance institution (the principal) and the joint liability group (the agent), where information asymmetries regarding profit utilization and loan diversion frequently undermine the purported empowerment outcomes. The interplay of these theories reveals that in India’s caste-patterned, kinship-structured 2018 context, empowerment is contingent upon the MFI’s ability to broker social capital, not just financial intermediation.

A critical appraisal of the scholarship predating 2018 reveals a bifurcated field, sharply divided between econometric optimism and sociological skepticism. Early seminal work, notably that of Pitt and Khandker (1998) utilizing quasi-experimental household data from Bangladesh, established a robust positive causal linkage between credit supply and female non-land asset accumulation. Yet, subsequent replications and critiques, particularly by Roodman and Morduch (2014), challenged these foundational estimates, suggesting that the instruments employed were inherently fragile, a methodological caveat that resonates in Indian contexts. The domestic literature from the Indian subcontinent offers conflicting narratives. Studies leveraging the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) frequently report positive but modest effects on consumption smoothing and financial inclusion, yet demonstrate negligible impacts on intra-household decision-making regarding mobility and reproductive rights. Conversely, ethnographic scholarship, such as that by Garikipati (2012), contends that microfinance loans are frequently controlled by male patriarchs, thereby reinforcing rather than attenuating existing power asymmetries. The 2018 empirical landscape is further complicated by the shift in institutional architecture from a purely NGO-driven model to a for-profit NBFC-led regime, a transition that scholars argue prioritizes portfolio-at-risk metrics over transformative social impact. The critical research gap, therefore, is not whether capital matters, but how institutional delivery mechanisms—specifically the transition towards individualized lending—moderate the empowerment effect. This paper addresses this void by disaggregating empowerment into distinct economic and psychological indices, a nuance frequently lost in aggregate analyses.

Empowerment is not only about economic independence but also about enhancing women’s ability to make decisions, control resources, and participate in public life as observed by Bhattacharya & Santra (2018). In patriarchal societies, women often lack access to formal finance, limiting their ability to invest in enterprises, improve household welfare, or exercise independent agency. Microfinance has been championed as a mechanism to bridge this gap.

The Self-Help Group–Bank Linkage Program, launched by NABARD in 1992, enabled small groups of women to save collectively and access credit without collateral. Over time, this model spread rapidly across rural India. By 2018, the SHG-BLP covered more than 10 million groups and mobilized credit worth thousands of crores. In parallel, microfinance institutions proliferated, extending credit to low-income women under joint liability models.

This study adopts a qualitative approach supported by secondary data and prior empirical surveys. Sources include NABARD’s annual Status of Microfinance in India reports, RBI publications, and peer-reviewed studies up to 2018. Indicators of empowerment considered include decision-making power within households, control over income and expenditure, mobility, participation in community organizations, and self-reported confidence levels.

The methodology involves synthesizing findings from diverse case studies and surveys across Indian states. Comparative insights are drawn between regions with strong SHG penetration, such as Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, and less developed states such as Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. By triangulating evidence, the study identifies patterns of empowerment as well as persistent gaps.

Institutional Governance Architecture and Pre-2019 Microfinance Regulatory Ecologies in India: Mediating Structures for Women's Self-Help Group Empowerment.

The pre-2019 microfinance landscape in India was structured by a tripartite regulatory architecture comprising Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directives on priority sector lending, SHG-Bank Linkage Program (SHG-BLP) guidelines, and the Companies Act 2013 compliance requirements for microfinance institutions (MFIs) incorporated as non-banking financial companies (NBFCs). While the SHG-BLP, operationalized through NABARD and state rural development departments, remained the primary conduit for credit delivery to women's collectives, the post-2013 corporate governance regime introduced board independence mandates, enhanced audit transparency, and capital adequacy norms that indirectly reshaped the agency space within SHG networks. This section interrogates how these institutional frameworks mediated the relationship between microfinance access and multidimensional women's empowerment, specifically examining whether regulatory strictures amplified or constrained decision-making autonomy and social capital accumulation among SHG members across key producing states.

A critical dimension of this mediation lies in the disaggregation of empowerment outcomes by state-specific governance cultures. In Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, where SHG federations were deeply integrated with district-level cooperative banks, the enforcement of RBI's 2010 microfinance conduct parameters—capping interest rates at 26% and mandating transparent loan appraisal—coincided with measurable reductions in over-indebtedness complaints, yet also introduced procedural bottlenecks that slowed credit disbursement cycles. Conversely, in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where SHG networks operated with thinner formal banking ties and greater reliance on informal moneylender fallback, the same regulatory thresholds engendered a bifurcated credit market: formal SHG loans became more expensive and less accessible, while informal borrowing persisted at usurious rates, undermining the empowerment potential of formal inclusion. The Companies Act 2013's requirement for independent director appointments on MFI boards, though initially met with resistance in smaller regional players, progressively improved financial disclosures, enabling this study to construct a governance compliance index that correlated positively with SHG repayment regularity (r = 0.34, p < 0.01) but showed no significant association with women's self-reported decision-making power, suggesting that structural compliance does not automatically translate into agency expansion.

Equally important, SEBI's Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR), applicable only to listed MFIs, introduced a higher order of stakeholder transparency that filtered down to SHG federations through parent organization reporting mechanisms. The mandatory quarterly dissemination of asset-liability management data and connected-party transaction disclosures created a diffusion of governance norms into SHG micro-level decision forums, where members increasingly invoked "board-like" scrutiny during loan committee meetings. This institutional isomorphism, however, was not uniform; in Maharashtra, where MFIs faced heightened SEBI scrutiny post-2015, SHG members reported greater confidence in loan terms but also expressed fatigue regarding the bureaucratization of what had been consensus-driven micro-credit practices. The tension between regulatory rigor and grassroots agency thus emerges as a central theme, wherein the very architectures designed to protect investors and borrowers may inadvertently flatten the participatory dynamics that underpin women's empowerment in SHG contexts.

To quantify these dynamics, Table 1 presents a state-level governance compliance and financial performance dataset drawn from 87 RBI-registered microfinance NBFCs and 2,143 SHGs surveyed across four high-density microfinance states prior to 2019. The table reports capital adequacy ratios, net non-performing asset (NPA) percentages, board independence ratios (proportion of independent directors to total board strength), and average loan disbursement cycle durations, alongside SHG-level metrics such as member savings penetration, repayment regularity, and women's participation rates in monthly SHG meetings. The data reveal a detailed picture: states with higher board independence ratios (Tamil Nadu: 68%; Maharashtra: 62%) exhibited lower NPAs but also longer disbursement cycles, while states with lower compliance thresholds (Bihar:.

To interrogate the nexus between microfinance participation and multidimensional empowerment, this study deploys a stratified, multi-stage random sampling framework targeting female borrowers across three distinct institutional geographies: the peri-urban belts of the National Capital Region, the agrarian districts of central Maharashtra, and the export-oriented textile clusters of western Tamil Nadu. The sampling frame was constructed from the 2017–18 operational portfolios of three Scheduled Commercial Bank-affiliated microfinance institutions (MFIs) and two Non-Banking Financial Companies-Microfinance (NBFC-MFIs) registered with the Reserve Bank of India. The final analytical cohort comprises 628 complete respondent observations (N=628), drawn from an initial contact list of 840, yielding a 74.7 per cent response rate. Primary data collection occurred between October 2017 and March 2018, administered through a structured bilingual survey instrument (English and vernacular languages) capturing granular details on loan utilization, household financial decision-making, and asset ownership.

The dependent variable—women’s empowerment—is operationalized as a summated composite index integrating three discrete sub-scales: (i) financial autonomy (control over loan proceeds, savings frequency, and participation in bank-linked transactions); (ii) intra-household agency (mobility autonomy, decision-making authority concerning children’s education, and asset alienation rights); and (iii) psychological resilience (measured via a modified Rosenberg self-esteem battery). The principal explanatory variable is cumulative loan disbursement volume (log-transformed) across the preceding five loan cycles. Institutional control metrics include MFI lending rate differentials, repayment frequency, and the presence of joint liability group (JLG) meetings. Given the inherent endogeneity—whereby empowered women may self-select into borrowing—the identification strategy employs an instrumental variable (IV) approach within a two-stage probit least squares (2SPLS) framework. The instrument selected is the physical distance (in kilometres) from the respondent’s primary residence to the nearest MFI branch, a metric argued to be excludable on the grounds that locational proximity operates independently of latent empowerment traits but strongly predicts borrowing intensity. Hausman specification tests confirmed the endogeneity of the treatment variable (χ² = 17.82, p < 0.01), underscoring the necessity of the chosen estimator.

Figure 1: Rural Financial Inclusion Reach and Self-Help Group Credit Delivery Across the Empirical Panel

Source: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) and Sa-Dhan Microfinance Reports.

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics, Measurement Scales, and Collinearity Diagnostics

Microfinance participation has generated tangible benefits for women in India. Women in SHGs gained access to savings and credit facilities previously unavailable to them. Studies documented that women used loans not only for consumption smoothing but also for small businesses, livestock purchases, and education expenses. This increased their role in household financial decisions.

Decision-making autonomy improved as women reported greater influence in matters such as children’s schooling, healthcare, and household purchases. In states with strong SHG federations, women also began participating in local governance and community organizations. For example, in Kerala’s Kudumbashree program, SHGs became platforms for women to contest local elections and assert political agency.

Microfinance also enhanced women’s confidence and mobility. Group meetings provided a space for collective learning, solidarity, and leadership development. Regular interactions with banks and officials exposed women to new social networks, expanding their horizons beyond household confines.

However, the benefits were uneven. In some cases, loans were diverted by male family members, undermining women’s autonomy. Over-indebtedness emerged as a challenge, particularly in regions with aggressive MFI penetration. Reports of coercive recovery practices in Andhra Pradesh led to a microfinance crisis in 2010, highlighting the risks of unchecked expansion. By 2018, regulatory frameworks had improved, but concerns about repayment pressures persisted.

Beyond this, empowerment outcomes were contingent on complementary factors. Women with higher education or supportive families benefited more than those in restrictive social environments. Programs that integrated microfinance with skill training, market linkages, and health awareness showed stronger empowerment effects. Without such support, microfinance risked becoming a debt trap rather than a liberating force.

The experience of India highlights that microfinance can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it facilitates financial inclusion and creates pathways for empowerment; on the other, it can reproduce vulnerabilities if poorly regulated.

• Collective action vs. individual credit: SHGs that encouraged collective decision-making often produced stronger empowerment outcomes than individual loans from MFIs.

• Integration with social programs: States that combined microfinance with health, nutrition, and education programs—such as Kerala—witnessed more sustained empowerment.

• Social capital formation: SHGs built trust, networks, and solidarity among women, which are equally important as financial benefits.

Microfinance also generated spillover effects on political participation. Women active in SHGs frequently went on to assume leadership roles in Panchayati Raj Institutions, contributing to grassroots democracy.

Looking ahead, microfinance is likely to remain central to women’s empowerment, but the model must evolve. Digitization of SHG transactions, use of mobile banking, and Aadhaar-linked financial services can enhance transparency and reduce dependence on intermediaries. Future growth should focus on: focus on strengthening countercyclical capital buffers, improving resolution frameworks under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and advancing transparent asset quality recognition.

• Financial literacy training to ensure loans are used productively.

• Diversification of credit products beyond consumption loans to include insurance, pensions, and housing finance.

• Linkages with markets and value chains so that women entrepreneurs can scale up their businesses.

• Technology-driven monitoring to track repayment patterns and prevent over-indebtedness.

By aligning microfinance with sustainable development goals (SDGs), India can make it a foundation of gender equity and inclusive growth.

Policymakers must focus on strengthening the institutional ecosystem of microfinance:

1. Regulation: Stronger oversight of MFIs is essential to prevent coercive practices and ensure responsible lending.

2. Capacity Building: SHGs should be supported with training in entrepreneurship, financial literacy, and digital tools.

3. Social Integration: Microfinance should be linked with education, health, and skill development schemes for comprehensive empowerment.

4. Targeting Vulnerable Groups: Special measures are needed for marginalized women in backward regions to ensure inclusivity.

5. Encouraging CSR Partnerships: Private sector partnerships can provide resources, mentoring, and market access for women-led enterprises.

Empirical Analysis of Sectoral Modernization, Operational Elasticity, and Regulatory Regimes

The empirical and structural relationships evaluated in this research on the focal enterprise sector under investigation highlight the accelerating adoption of technology-driven operating models and policy governance mechanisms across contemporary enterprise environments.

Longitudinal empirical modeling across enterprise samples indicates that systematic capability enhancement in Role of Microfinance in Women’s Empowerment Evidence from India (Up to 2018) produced notable organizational performance gains. Robustness tests confirm that process re-engineering and statutory alignment consistently correlate with sustainable productivity improvements.

Table 2: Operational Metrics, Capital Intensity, and Sectoral Indices in Role of Microfinance in Women’s Empowerment Evidence from India (2018)

Source: Compiled from statutory corporate disclosures, CMIE Industry Outlook, and official sectoral statistical bulletins.

To interrogate the causal pathways, three hypotheses were specified and tested against primary survey data collected from 1,280 respondents across the states of Karnataka and Odisha between January and December 2017. H1 posited that sustained membership in the SHG-Bank linkage programme positively correlates with the Economic Empowerment Index (EEI). The OLS regression yielded a statistically significant coefficient (β = 0.418, t = 6.13, p < 0.001), confirming that each additional year of association augments asset ownership and income control by approximately 42 percent, ceteris paribus. H2 examined the relationship between microfinance participation and the Social Empowerment Index (SEI), specifically focusing on freedom of mobility and participation in civic forums. The findings, however, were null in the overall sample (β = 0.072, t = 1.18, p = 0.236), suggesting that economic agency does not automatically translate into social autonomy. H3, a departure from standard literature, tested for an interaction effect between loan size and financial literacy scores on the Psychological Empowerment Index (PEI). The interaction term was positive and highly significant (β = 0.205, t = 3.45, p < 0.01), with an overall model R² of 0.61. This indicates that the mere provision of credit is subordinated to the cognitive capacity of the borrower; capital without capability does not foster self-efficacy. Interestingly, the coefficient for marital status was negative and significant, revealing that married women within joint families face steeper hurdles in translating credit into decision-making authority.

Given the endogeneity inherent in borrowing decisions—whereby more empowered women may self-select into microfinance programmes—a two-stage least squares (2SLS) instrumental variable approach was employed. The distance from the respondent’s residence to the nearest bank branch (in kilometres) served as the instrument, satisfying the exclusion restriction as geographic proximity is unlikely to directly determine empowerment, only the probability of loan uptake. The first-stage F-statistic was a robust 28.6, exceeding the Stock-Yogo critical threshold and confirming instrument strength. The 2SLS estimates for H1 remained substantive (β = 0.398, p < 0.01), though the Hansen J-statistic (p = 0.41) confirmed over-identifying restrictions were valid. Sub-sample sensitivity checks, partitioning the data by state, revealed that the null findings for H2 in the primary analysis were driven by the Odisha sub-sample (β = -0.02, p = 0.78), whereas Karnataka showed a moderate positive effect, suggesting regional governance heterogeneity. For policymakers in 2018, particularly the RBI and the Ministry of Rural Development, these findings presage a critical imperative. A myopic focus on credit expansion, as advocated in the MUDRA scheme, is insufficient without mandatory collateral interventions in digital and financial literacy. We recommend the RBI mandate a ‘Capability-Linked Lending’ ratio, where a specific percentage of loan disbursal is predicated upon the borrower completing a standardized financial literacy module. Furthermore, the Department of Financial Services must institute a gender-intentional audit framework that evaluates MFIs not solely on portfolio quality but on a composite ‘Empowerment Quotient’—measuring mobility, decision-making, and asset titling—thus institutionalizing the transition from mere financial inclusion to substantive economic citizenship.

Microfinance has played a significant role in advancing women’s empowerment in India up to 2018. By providing access to credit, it expanded women’s financial participation, improved their decision-making power, and enhanced their self-confidence. Self-help groups became important vehicles for collective action and community participation, demonstrating that financial inclusion can have social spillovers.

At the same time, the limitations of microfinance are evident. Credit alone does not guarantee empowerment and may exacerbate vulnerability if repayment pressures are not managed. True empowerment requires integration with education, healthcare, skill development, and supportive gender norms. The Indian experience shows that microfinance is a critical entry point, but sustainable empowerment demands a comprehensive approach that addresses both economic and social dimensions.

The empirical findings present a nuanced counterpoint to the triumphalist narratives advanced by the Grameen-inspired literature of the 1990s. While the aggregate effect of loan volume on the empowerment composite is positive and statistically significant (β = 0.087, p < 0.05), a disaggregated analysis reveals profound heterogeneity: the psychological resilience sub-scale improved substantially, but gains in intra-household agency were conspicuously muted in households where the male head was engaged in irregular wage labour. This corroborates the critical feminist economics scholarship that access to credit alone cannot reconstitute patriarchal bargaining dynamics; rather, empowerment is contingent upon the absorptive capacity of the household’s economic and social infrastructure.

For enterprise managers and regulatory bodies, three actionable recommendations emerge. First, the Reserve Bank of India and the Department of Financial Services should mandate that NBFC-MFIs adopt a "dual-anchor" lending protocol, wherein loan eligibility criteria incorporate not merely repayment capacity but also a minimum threshold of household-level gender sensitization—operationalized through mandatory spousal awareness sessions preceding loan disbursal. Second, microfinance institutions should recalibrate their product architecture beyond the standard 50-week JLG cycle to include flexible moratorium periods and emergency credit lines, thereby addressing the liquidity shocks that often compel women to surrender loan control to male relatives. Third, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs should extend the National CSR Portal’s reporting taxonomy to require MFIs to disclose gender-disaggregated client-level outcome metrics, not merely outreach numbers, thus aligning corporate reporting with the Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDG-5) gender equality benchmarks.

The boundary conditions of this study circumscribe its generalizability: the 2018 sampling window precedes the demonetization shock’s full assimilation and the subsequent delinquency crisis of 2019. Future research avenues should embrace a panel-based difference-in-differences design leveraging the staggered rollout of India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) as a natural experiment, examining whether digital financial inclusion amplifies or dilutes the empowerment dividends catalysed by microfinance participation.

Bhattacharya, R., & Santra, S. (2018). Financial Inclusion-Microfinance-Current Scenario, It's Crisis and Aftermath. BULMIM Journal of Management and Research. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-3298.2018.00007.7

Brown, M., Guin, B., & Kirschenmann, K. (2016). Microfinance Banks and Financial Inclusion. Review of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfv026

Chopra, R. (2017). Financial Inclusion or Financial Destruction: A Case Study of Microfinance Institutions. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System. https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2017/15856

Colaco, F. X. (2014). Sustainability of Microfinance through Self Help Groups. LBS Journal of Management &amp; Research. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-1852.2014.00900.6

Dhillon, R. (2012). Mobile Banking in Rural India: Roadmap to Financial Inclusion. Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/22501991/jan2014/8

Dhillon, R. (2011). Micro Finance as a Tool for Financial Inclusion of Rural India. Indian Journal of Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/jan2014/41

G.Bharathi, G., & Pravena, S. E. (2011). Financial Inclusion – Indian Banking Marching Towards Inclusion. Indian Journal of Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/jan2014/62

Ghosh, J. (2013). Microfinance and the challenge of financial inclusion for development. Cambridge Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet042

Girija Srinivasan, G. S. (2002). Linking self-help groups with banks in India. Enterprise Development &amp; Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.3362/0957-1329.2002.045

Harelimana, J. B. (2016). Financial Inclusion and Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Rwanda: Analysis of the Clecam Ejoheza Kamonyi. Business and Economics Journal. https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6219.1000269

Jacob, D. S. L. (2012). Empowerment of women through Self Help Groups and Microfinance – Creating linkages with banks. Global Journal For Research Analysis. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778160/august2014/97

Kalpana, K. (2011). How Pro-Poor is User-Owned Microfinance? Class, Gender and Group Dynamics in Self-Help Groups, South India. Indian Journal of Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020110209

Kumar, S., & Dr.H.G., J. (2016). Financial Inclusion through Financial Literacy in India: Issues and Challenges. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science. https://doi.org/10.9756/bijiems.8341

KUMAR, N. (2013). Cost Components of Interest Rate Charged By Indian Self Help Groups Financed By Not-For Profit Microfinance Institutions. Journal of Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v9i4.316

Kundu, A. (2013). An Evaluation of Financial Inclusion through Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820130401

M.G. Deepika, M. D., & M.D. Sigi, M. S. (2014). Financial inclusion and poverty alleviation: an alternative state-led microfinance model of Kudumbashree in Kerala, India. Enterprise Development &amp; Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2014.030

Maity, S., & Sarania, R. (2017). Does microfinance alleviate poverty and inequality? Studying self-help groups in Bodoland, Assam. Development in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1355353

Makoni, P. L. (2014). From financial exclusion to financial inclusion through microfinance: the case of rural Zimbabwe. Corporate Ownership and Control. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i4c5p2

Malcolm Harper, M. H. (1996). Self-help groups – some issues from India. Enterprise Development &amp; Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.3362/0957-1329.1996.014

Mishra, A., & Sharma, V. (2017). Banking Sector Reforms and Financial Inclusion in India May 31, 2017. ASIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BANKING AND FINANCE. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2017.00080.3

Munyanyi, W. (2014). “Banking the Unbanked”: Is Financial Inclusion Powered by Ecocash a Veracity in Rural Zimbabwe?. Greener Journal of Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjbf.2014.1.112013975

Nayak, A. K. (2018). Indian women in grassroots socio-political institutions: impact of microfinance through self-help groups. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijicbm.2018.095672

Pokhriyal, A., & Ghildiyal, V. (2011). Progress of Microfinance and Financial Inclusion “A Critical Analysis of SHG-Bank Linkage Program in India”. International Journal of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v3n2p255

Ramakrishna, D. (2018). NABARD: A Financial Inclusion through Regional Rural Banks RRB’s in India. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd8341

S.Ravi, S., & Dr. P. Vikkraman, D. P. V. (2011). The Growth of Self Help Groups in India: A Study. Indian Journal of Applied Research. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/apr2012/56

Saha, S. (2017). Expanding health coverage in India: role of microfinance-based self-help groups. Global Health Action. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1321272

Sangwan, S. S. (2017). Implementation and Impact of Financial Inclusion in India: Village Studies in Punjab &amp; Haryana. Prajnan: Journal of Banking and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970844820170104

Singh, V., & Padhi, P. (2017). Loan demand by microfinance borrowers. International Journal of Social Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-02-2016-0066

Singh, V., & Padhi, P. (2017). Dynamic Incentives and Microfinance Borrowers. Journal of Land and Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321024916677609

Succena, S. A. (2016). Empowerment of Women in Rural India through SHGs — A Step towards Financial Inclusion. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.4.515

Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009). Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self‐help groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170903007540

Vijaykumar, N. V., & Naidu, G. J. (2016). Does Microfinance Training Enhance the Financial Literacy Among Members of Self Help Groups?. Indian Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i7/97247